Javascript required
Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

What Does the Acronym Cer Stand for

Wood letter of SMART objectives definition with hand writing definition for smart goal setting concept

Editor's note: this page was updat­ed in Jan­u­ary 2020 for accuracy.

George T. Doran report­ed­ly coined the phrase SMART objec­tives back in 1981. Since then, the acronym has evolved and expe­ri­enced a num­ber of iter­a­tions — mean­ing dif­fer­ent man­agers define SMART objec­tives in dif­fer­ent ways.

While choice is almost always a good thing, in addi­tion to our per­for­mance man­age­ment soft­ware, we have oth­er guides on per­for­mance man­age­ment tools and process­es avail­able. You like­ly have a num­ber of ques­tions you want answer­ing — which is why we want­ed to cre­ate this com­pre­hen­sive resource. Below, we will explore the following:

  • What Are SMART Objectives?
  • What SMART Objec­tives Def­i­n­i­tion Should I Use?
  • What is Clear Review's Sug­gest­ed SMART Objec­tives Definition?
  • How Do I Get Employ­ees to Write Their Own SMART Objectives?
  • How Do SMART Objec­tives Dif­fer to Per­son­al Devel­op­ment Objectives?

Want to learn more about cre­at­ing SMART objec­tives for Mil­len­ni­als? Read our in-depth blog post on this top­ic here .

What Are SMART Objectives?

Put very sim­ply, SMART objec­tives (or SMART goals) are a form of objec­tive set­ting which allows man­agers and employ­ees to cre­ate, track and accom­plish, short-and-long-term goals.

All too often, goal set­ting gets side­lined in busi­ness. In fact, accord­ing to a Gallup poll, rough­ly half of all employ­ees don't know what is expect­ed of them at work. When this is the case, employ­ees get frus­trat­ed, con­fused and dis­en­gaged. On top of this, they are fat­ed to let man­age­ment down, as they don't have a clear pic­ture of what goals to accom­plish — or how to go about achiev­ing them.

This is where the SMART acronym comes into play. This sys­tem gives organ­i­sa­tions a smarter way of set­ting objec­tives. Through the use of SMART objec­tives, employ­ee and line man­ag­er can put togeth­er an action plan to improve per­for­mance, increase pro­duc­tiv­i­ty and con­tribute to organ­i­sa­tion­al goals.

SMART Objec­tives Exam­ples: How To Define SMART

So now you know exact­ly what SMART goals are, the ques­tion becomes — what SMART objec­tives def­i­n­i­tion should I use? How do I define objec­tives? How does the SMART acronym break down for the major­i­ty of busi­ness­es? Below, we list the dif­fer­ent (and most com­mon­ly used) versions.

S —SMART Objec­tives Should Be SPE­CIF­IC and STRETCHING

The "S" in SMART usu­al­ly stands for spe­cif­ic, to ensure the objec­tive is not vague. Unclear objec­tives are a recipe for dis­as­ter and leave employ­ees uncer­tain how to act, which means you will not expe­ri­ence a true increase in pro­duc­tiv­i­ty. Using the Gallup ref­er­ence above, we know many man­agers are fail­ing when it comes to help­ing employ­ees set, under­stand and achieve goals.

Are your SMART objec­tives real­ly spe­cif­ic? Take some time to hon­est­ly con­sid­er this. For exam­ple,​"increase sales" is far from a spe­cif­ic objec­tive. An employ­ee might ques­tion: more sales of what? How many more sales? By when? This uncer­tain­ty will only add to stress lev­els and can lead to employ­ee burnout (some­thing that has very recent­ly been recog­nised by the World Health Organ­i­sa­tion (WHO) as an organ­i­sa­tion­al phe­nom­e­non of concern).

A spe­cif­ic objec­tive would be:

"Increase sales of adver­tis­ing space this cal­en­dar year by15%".

This gives employ­ees a clear­er idea about what to achieve and by when.

In addi­tion to spe­cif­ic, we also sug­gest objec­tives should be stretch­ing. Stud­ies have shown that when an objec­tive is stretch­ing, it is more moti­vat­ing for the indi­vid­ual and leads to high­er lev­els of achieve­ment. Put sim­ply, stretch­ing goals cre­ate bet­ter results. It should be not­ed, how­ev­er, the degree of stretch needs to be rea­son­able to ensure the objec­tive is real­is­ti­cal­ly achiev­able (see A –​"Achiev­able" below).

M —SMART Objec­tives Should Be MEASURABLE

When it comes to the SMART objec­tives def­i­n­i­tion, "M" near­ly always stands for measurable.

It is impor­tant for both an employ­ee and their man­ag­er to under­stand what suc­cess looks like for the objec­tive. This is the only way both par­ties will know if the objec­tive has been achieved. This is why objec­tives need to be track­able, mea­sur­able goals.

The mea­sure of aSMART objec­tive could be quan­ti­ta­tive or qual­i­ta­tive. A quan­ti­ta­tive mea­sure might be​"Reduce depart­men­tal over­heads by 10% this finan­cial year", while a good qual­i­ta­tive objec­tive would be​"Project com­plet­ed on time and with­in bud­get to the sat­is­fac­tion of the customer".

A —SMART Objec­tives Should Be ACHIEV­ABLE and AGREED

This let­ter is where some vari­ance occurs between dif­fer­ent SMART objec­tive def­i­n­i­tions. The most com­mon vari­a­tions are achiev­able, attain­able, aligned and agreed. We sug­gest using achiev­able over attain­able, as the word sounds slight­ly less bureau­crat­ic. While per­for­mance objec­tives should cer­tain­ly be aligned upward to the over­all objec­tives of the organ­i­sa­tion, we pre­fer to use rel­e­vant as the "R" to cov­er this point, as​"aligned" can sound like busi­ness jar­gon to employees.

The "agreed" point is an impor­tant one — all objec­tives should be agreed by both the indi­vid­ual and the man­ag­er in ques­tion. If the objec­tive is forced upon the indi­vid­ual by the man­ag­er, there will be no own­er­ship on behalf of the indi­vid­ual and the objec­tive is less like­ly to be achieved. On the oth­er hand, if the employ­ee has the free­dom to cre­ate their own objec­tives to a cer­tain extent, the goal is far more like­ly to be achieved, and to a high standard.

If you use an online per­for­mance man­age­ment soft­ware sys­tem to cap­ture employ­ee objec­tives, the agreed word may not be nec­es­sary, as such sys­tems tend to ensure that both par­ties for­mal­ly agree on the objec­tives before they are finalised.

R —SMART Objec­tives Should Be RELEVANT

An effec­tive per­for­mance objec­tive should be rel­e­vant to what the organ­i­sa­tion and/​or the team needs to achieve. Oth­er­wise, objec­tives could be suc­cess­ful­ly deliv­ered but have no impact on the over­all per­for­mance of the organ­i­sa­tion — defeat­ing the ulti­mate pur­pose of per­for­mance man­age­ment. There­fore, the over­all goals of the organ­i­sa­tion or team should be shared with indi­vid­u­als, in a lan­guage they can under­stand, before employ­ee objec­tives are set.

In this sense, we rec­om­mend align­ing SMART objec­tives upward, rather than cas­cad­ing goals down­ward. This will improve com­pa­ny com­mu­ni­ca­tion and trans­paren­cy while enabling indi­vid­u­als to come up with objec­tives that will con­tribute to the achieve­ment of these over­all goals.

Note that some SMART objec­tives def­i­n­i­tions use​"real­is­tic" for the R. Of course, real­is­tic goals are impor­tant. How­ev­er, if you have used achiev­able as the A, this is not nec­es­sary, as the two words are essen­tial­ly mak­ing the same point.

T —SMART Objec­tives Should Be TIME-BOUND

It is very impor­tant that objec­tives have a tar­get date, or a time frame for when they should be com­plet­ed — hence time-bound. This not only pro­vides a sense of urgency but also helps when it comes to review­ing whether or not the objec­tive has been suc­cess­ful­ly achieved. Some com­men­ta­tors advo­cate using​"track­able" for the T instead. How­ev­er, our view is if a clear suc­cess mea­sure is defined (i.e. the objec­tive is mea­sur­able) and a tar­get dead­line set, then it should be easy to track progress towards achiev­ing the objec­tive anyway.

What Is Clear Review's Sug­gest­ed SMART Objec­tives Definition?

Here is a sum­ma­ry of our sug­gest­ed SMART Objec­tives def­i­n­i­tion for use with­in your per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tem — along with ques­tions that can help prompt indi­vid­u­als when writ­ing objec­tives. Each of the SMART cri­te­ria is as impor­tant as the oth­er, so be care­ful not to over­look one ele­ment or favour one aspect over another:

Specif­ic and Stretch­ing

  • Is the objec­tive clear, pre­cise and unambiguous?
  • Is the objec­tive stretch­ing in some way (but still real­is­ti­cal­ly achievable)?

Measur­able

  • Does the objec­tive say what suc­cess will look like and how it will be mea­sured, in terms of quan­ti­ty or quality?

Achiev­able and Agreed

  • Is the objec­tive real­is­ti­cal­ly achiev­able (but not too eas­i­ly), tak­ing into account the time-frame, resources and sup­port that are available?
  • Have both the indi­vid­ual and their man­ag­er agreed on the objective?

Rele­vant

  • Is the objec­tive rel­e­vant to what the busi­ness and /​or the team need to achieve?
  • Will it sup­port the achieve­ment of the over­all goals of the organisation?

Time-bound

  • Has a spe­cif­ic date been agreed for when the objec­tive should be completed?
  • Is the tar­get date relat­ed to the objec­tive rather than sim­ply coin­cid­ing with the end of the review year?

To fur­ther help guide your SMART objec­­tive-set­t­ing process and to make the most out of this valu­able per­for­mance man­age­ment tool, you can down­load our free PDF tip sheet for set­ting SMART objec­tives. You can also check out our oth­er avail­able resources here.

How Do I Get Employ­ees to Write Their Own SMART Objectives?

It is essen­tial you encour­age employ­ees to take own­er­ship of their objec­tives and cre­ate them them­selves, with the sup­port, encour­age­ment and super­vi­sion of their line man­ag­er. We have cre­at­ed a detailed how-to guide on how to get employ­ees to write SMART objec­tives, but it all boils down to communication.

Once you can define SMART objec­tives, man­agers must explain the impor­tance of this per­for­mance man­age­ment tool to their employ­ees. Employ­ees should be encour­aged to chal­lenge them­selves, while also being real­is­tic about their par­tic­u­lar strengths and weak­ness­es. Com­pa­nies can then use HR per­for­mance man­age­ment review soft­ware to keep employ­ees engaged — and the lines of com­mu­ni­ca­tion open at all times.

How Do SMART Objec­tives Dif­fer to per­son­al Devel­op­ment Objectives?

SMART objec­tives tend to refer to goals that help to fur­ther organ­i­sa­tion­al objec­tives. This means com­pa­nies are ulti­mate­ly more pro­duc­tive — and bet­ter able to advance and improve.

Per­son­al devel­op­ment objec­tives, on the oth­er hand, describe spe­cif­ic areas where employ­ees feel they need to devel­op to achieve their per­for­mance objec­tives or career goals. They might not be specif­i­cal­ly tied to cor­po­rate objec­tives, but by achiev­ing per­son­al objec­tives, employ­ees can become stronger and more con­fi­dent — and there­fore, more of an asset to the team. Although there are dif­fer­ences, the SMART acronym can also be used to design per­son­al objectives.

Clear Review makes set­ting and track­ing SMART objec­tives easy. To see the world's sim­plest (and most effec­tive) per­for­mance man­age­ment soft­ware in action, watch our 7‑minute per­for­mance man­age­ment soft­ware demo video now.

Experience our easy-to-use objective setting and performance management software

Book a Live Demo

What Does the Acronym Cer Stand for

Source: https://www.clearreview.com/resources/guides/which-smart-objectives-definition-should-i-use/